AI Model Comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol (max)

Compare Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (max) with benchmark results, speed, pricing, and practical workflow guidance.

Best For Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort)

  • Lower cost per 1M tokens
  • Faster time to first token
  • Superior HLE benchmark performance

Best For GPT-5.6 Sol (max)

  • Higher sustained output speed
  • Stronger LCR and TAU2 performance
  • Extensive benchmark validation

Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol (max) represent the latest frontier in AI. While Claude Opus 5 offers faster response initiation, GPT-5.6 Sol (max) provides superior throughput and a broader range of benchmark performance metrics.

Quick Take

Released in July 2026, Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Sol (max) (OpenAI) are top-tier models competing for dominance in intelligence and coding tasks. Claude Opus 5 focuses on adaptive reasoning, while GPT-5.6 Sol (max) emphasizes high-speed output and comprehensive benchmark coverage.

Benchmark Read

Performance metrics reveal a tight race. Claude Opus 5 holds an Intelligence Index of 60.1, slightly edging out GPT-5.6 Sol (max) at 58.9. In coding, they are nearly identical, with GPT-5.6 Sol (max) scoring 77.4 compared to Claude Opus 5's 77.

Specific benchmark results highlight different strengths:

  • GPQA: GPT-5.6 Sol (max) leads with 0.941 vs. 0.937.
  • LCR: GPT-5.6 Sol (max) scores 0.736, outperforming Claude Opus 5 at 0.686.
  • HLE: Claude Opus 5 performs better at 0.525 compared to 0.472.
  • SciCode: GPT-5.6 Sol (max) leads slightly at 0.561 vs. 0.55.

GPT-5.6 Sol (max) provides additional validation through IFBench (0.726), TerminalBench Hard (0.659), and TAU2 (0.850).

Cost and Speed

Cost structures differ significantly. Claude Opus 5 is more affordable with a blended rate of $10.00/1M tokens, compared to $11.25/1M for GPT-5.6 Sol (max).

Speed profiles offer a trade-off:

  • Time to First Token: Claude Opus 5 is significantly faster at 22.558s, whereas GPT-5.6 Sol (max) takes 86.493s.
  • Output Speed: GPT-5.6 Sol (max) is faster at 73.856 tok/s, while Claude Opus 5 operates at 60.357 tok/s.

Best Fit

Claude Opus 5 is best suited for interactive applications where low latency for the initial response is critical. GPT-5.6 Sol (max) is better suited for heavy-duty, high-volume generation tasks where the sustained output speed compensates for the longer initial wait time.

Benchmark table

Side-by-side scores, speed, and pricing for the selected models.

Metric Anthropic Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort) OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol (max)
Index Scores
Intelligence Index 60.1 58.9
Coding Index 77.0 77.4
Math Index--
Benchmark Scores
GPQA 93.7 94.1
SciCode 55.0 56.1
IFBench- 72.7
HLE 52.5 47.2
LCR 68.7 73.7
TAU2- 85.1
TerminalBench Hard- 65.9

Verdict

Choose Claude Opus 5 if your workflow requires rapid time-to-first-token responses and lower overall costs. Opt for GPT-5.6 Sol (max) if you prioritize higher output speeds and require the extensive reasoning and agentic capabilities demonstrated by its superior performance in benchmarks like LCR and TAU2.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!