Quick Take
Released in July 2026, Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.6 Sol (max) (OpenAI) are top-tier models competing for dominance in intelligence and coding tasks. Claude Opus 5 focuses on adaptive reasoning, while GPT-5.6 Sol (max) emphasizes high-speed output and comprehensive benchmark coverage.
Benchmark Read
Performance metrics reveal a tight race. Claude Opus 5 holds an Intelligence Index of 60.1, slightly edging out GPT-5.6 Sol (max) at 58.9. In coding, they are nearly identical, with GPT-5.6 Sol (max) scoring 77.4 compared to Claude Opus 5's 77.
Specific benchmark results highlight different strengths:
- GPQA: GPT-5.6 Sol (max) leads with 0.941 vs. 0.937.
- LCR: GPT-5.6 Sol (max) scores 0.736, outperforming Claude Opus 5 at 0.686.
- HLE: Claude Opus 5 performs better at 0.525 compared to 0.472.
- SciCode: GPT-5.6 Sol (max) leads slightly at 0.561 vs. 0.55.
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) provides additional validation through IFBench (0.726), TerminalBench Hard (0.659), and TAU2 (0.850).
Cost and Speed
Cost structures differ significantly. Claude Opus 5 is more affordable with a blended rate of $10.00/1M tokens, compared to $11.25/1M for GPT-5.6 Sol (max).
Speed profiles offer a trade-off:
- Time to First Token: Claude Opus 5 is significantly faster at 22.558s, whereas GPT-5.6 Sol (max) takes 86.493s.
- Output Speed: GPT-5.6 Sol (max) is faster at 73.856 tok/s, while Claude Opus 5 operates at 60.357 tok/s.
Best Fit
Claude Opus 5 is best suited for interactive applications where low latency for the initial response is critical. GPT-5.6 Sol (max) is better suited for heavy-duty, high-volume generation tasks where the sustained output speed compensates for the longer initial wait time.
Comments (0)
to join the discussion
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!