Gemini 4 Carbon vs Muse Wonder Full: benchmarks and token cost

This comparison uses Gemini 4 Carbon (High) and Muse Wonder Full (Max). It summarises the current captured benchmark records, with no new hands-on test.

A measured index comparison with incomplete commercial data

Carbon records 60.0 against Muse Wonder Full’s 50.1. Carbon has captured token prices and response metrics; Muse’s price and performance fields are unavailable. The missing values should remain unknown rather than becoming zero or a claim that Muse is free. A complete operational comparison needs those additional measurements and current access information.

How to evaluate the difference

The intelligence index is an aggregate measurement, not a percentage of correct answers in an application. Input and output prices are separate rates per million tokens. Coding and math indices are unavailable in this capture and must not be read as zero. First-token latency and output-token throughput measure different parts of response time. Use the same task set, effort settings and acceptance criteria when comparing variants. Provider features, access and deployment requirements need their own checks. These notes report captured data and editorial evaluation criteria; they do not claim a new hands-on test.