Peers demand more protection from AI for creatives

Here's a concise rewrite of the provided article:

Lords Again Challenge Government on AI and Copyright

The House of Lords has once again rejected the government's stance on copyright protection for creatives in the face of Artificial Intelligence (AI). This marks the second time the Lords have pushed back on this issue.

The core of the dispute revolves around the Data (Use and Access) Bill and its handling of copyright protection for artists.

Key Points of Contention

• The Lords initially approved an amendment that aimed to provide greater copyright safeguards for creative industries against AI data scraping.
• MPs subsequently overruled this amendment, sending the Bill back to the Lords.
• Technology Minister Baroness Jones argued that the amendment would result in "piecemeal" legislation, preempting consultations on AI and copyright.

Accusations and Criticism

The Lords' renewed push for protection has been fueled by strong criticism:

• Baroness Kidron, a film director, accused ministers of being influenced by "whisperings of Silicon Valley."
• Sir Elton John publicly condemned the government, accusing them of potentially "committing theft".