Head-to-head AI model comparison graphic: Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic) vs Muse Wonder (Meta). Intelligence index 50.0 vs 43.6; output speed 61 vs 134 tokens per second; time to first token 98s vs 26s; output price $50.00 vs $20.00 per million tokens; input price $10.00 vs $4.00 per million tokens. franklineh.com
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder: head-to-head AI benchmark comparison. Muse Wonder leads on output speed, time to first token, output price and input price; Claude Fable 5.1 leads on intelligence index.
Head to headUpdated

Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh vs Muse Wonder Max compared

Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh leads the intelligence index 50.0 to 43.6. Muse Wonder Max costs 60% less on blended price. See token costs, speed and which to pick.

Pick it for Claude Fable 5.1 · Xhigh, Default Fallback

  • Higher intelligence index: 50.0 against 43.6.

Pick it for Muse Wonder · Max

  • Lower cost: $8.00 against $20.00 for 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens.
  • Faster output: 134 tokens per second against 61 tokens per second.
  • Shorter wait for the first token: 26 seconds against 98 seconds.

By the numbers

MetricClaude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)Muse Wonder (Max)
Intelligence Index50.043.6
Input price (per 1M tokens)$10.00$4.00
Output price (per 1M tokens)$50.00$20.00
Output speed (tokens/s)61134
Time to first token98s26s
Release date2026-09-012026-10-12

Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) from Anthropic and Muse Wonder (Max) from Meta are both tracked in Franklin AI's benchmark catalogue. Muse Wonder Max streams output at about 134 tokens per second, 2.2 times the rate of Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh. All numbers are the catalogue's recorded values; nobody ran either model by hand for this page.

Muse Wonder Max is the faster writer

Measured output speed is 61 tokens per second for Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh and 134 tokens per second for Muse Wonder Max. That makes Muse Wonder Max roughly 2.2 times as fast at writing. The wait for the first token averages 98 seconds on Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh against 26 seconds on Muse Wonder Max. Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh waits 3.8 times as long before its first token. Waits that long are felt on every chat-style request, though they matter less for batch jobs.

For an 800-token response, first token plus generation comes to roughly 111 seconds on Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh and 32 seconds on Muse Wonder Max.

Generation gap

The release dates are September 1, 2026 for Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh and October 12, 2026 for Muse Wonder Max, 41 days apart. That is close enough to count them as the same generation.

Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh leads on the intelligence index

On the intelligence index, Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh scores 50.0 against 43.6 for Muse Wonder Max. That is a clear margin for an index that averages many evaluations.

Among 109 active scored models, Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh sits 18th and Muse Wonder Max 28th.

There are no coding or math index scores for either model in the catalogue, which keeps this comparison at the aggregate level.

Price per token

Per million tokens, Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh charges $10.00 for input and $50.00 for output, while Muse Wonder Max charges $4.00 and $20.00. That makes Muse Wonder Max's output 60% cheaper.

A reference job of 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens costs $20.00 with Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh and $8.00 with Muse Wonder Max, so Muse Wonder Max saves $12.00. A bigger example, a support assistant answering 10,000 conversations of 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each, costs $450 on Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh and $180 on Muse Wonder Max: a gap of $270.

Is the price in proportion?

Per point of intelligence index, Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh costs $0.40 of blended price per million tokens and Muse Wonder Max $0.18. Muse Wonder Max delivers each index point for 54% less; whether Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh's extra 6.4 points are worth the premium depends on how often your tasks need them.

Quick answers

Is Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh better than Muse Wonder Max?

Not across the board: Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh scores higher on the intelligence index, 50.0 to 43.6; Muse Wonder Max is 60% cheaper on blended price; and Muse Wonder Max streams output 2.2 times as fast.

How much do Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh and Muse Wonder Max cost?

Muse Wonder Max is cheaper on a blended basis. Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh lists $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder Max lists $4.00 and $20.00. For 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens that is $20.00 against $8.00.

Was this comparison tested by hand?

The figures are the recorded benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's model catalogue. This page is written from that data automatically; neither model was tested by hand for it.

Are Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh and Muse Wonder Max from the same company?

Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh is made by Anthropic and Muse Wonder Max by Meta. Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh was released on September 1, 2026 and Muse Wonder Max on October 12, 2026.

When were Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh and Muse Wonder Max released?

Muse Wonder Max is newer. It was released on October 12, 2026, 41 days after Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh (September 1, 2026).

Final whistle

Short answer: Muse Wonder Max is the stronger all-round pick on this data, while Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh makes sense in narrower cases. Pick Claude Fable 5.1 Xhigh if you need the higher overall score (50.0 against 43.6). Pick Muse Wonder Max if cost matters ($20.00 against $50.00 per million output tokens) and long outputs need to finish quickly.

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) and Muse Wonder (Max) pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!