Head-to-head AI model comparison graphic: Claude Fable 5.2 (Anthropic) vs Gemini 4 Argon (Google). Intelligence index 64.6 vs 50.4; output speed 95 vs 89 tokens per second; time to first token 4.2 min vs 52s; output price $40.00 vs $20.00 per million tokens; input price $8.00 vs $4.00 per million tokens. franklineh.com
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 Argon: head-to-head AI benchmark comparison. Gemini 4 Argon leads on time to first token, output price and input price; Claude Fable 5.2 leads on intelligence index and output speed.
Head to headUpdated

Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High) benchmark comparison

Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 64.6 and 50.4 on the captured intelligence index. Compare token rates and response timing.

Pick it for Claude Fable 5.2 · Max, Default Fallback

  • Test Fable when the aggregate gap and output rate warrant a trial.

Pick it for Gemini 4 Argon · High

  • Try Argon for short responses where the first-token wait matters.

By the numbers

These figures describe the two model configurations shown here. A dash means the source snapshot had no usable figure for that metric. Scores, speed and API pricing may change as providers update models.

MetricClaude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback)Gemini 4 Argon (High)
Intelligence Index64.650.4
Input price (per 1M tokens)$8.00$4.00
Output price (per 1M tokens)$40.00$20.00
Output speed (tokens/s)9589
Time to first token4.2 min52s
Release date2026-11-092026-09-30

The current benchmark capture reports aggregate intelligence indices of 64.6 for Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) and 50.4 for Gemini 4 Argon (High).

Argon starts sooner, Fable emits faster

Argon lists $4 input and $20 output per million tokens, half Fable’s $8 and $40. Argon has the shorter captured first-token wait. Fable records the higher intelligence index and a higher output rate.

What to measure on your workload

For a streaming interface, check the wait for the first meaningful part of the answer. For a batch job, measure the full response time and the number of outputs that meet your quality standard. Those tests answer different questions from the aggregate index.

Questions about Claude Fable 5.2 and Gemini 4 Argon

How long does each variant take to start responding?

The captured time to first token is 253.38 seconds for Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) and 52.14 seconds for Gemini 4 Argon (High).

What is the measured output speed?

Captured output throughput is 94.67 tokens per second for Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) and 88.96 tokens per second for Gemini 4 Argon (High).

What release dates does the benchmark record list?

Claude Fable 5.2 has a recorded release date of 2026-11-09. Gemini 4 Argon has a recorded release date of 2026-09-30.

Final whistle

Argon lists $4 input and $20 output per million tokens, half Fable’s $8 and $40. Argon has the shorter captured first-token wait. Fable records the higher intelligence index and a higher output rate.

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the Claude Fable 5.2 (Max, Default Fallback) and Gemini 4 Argon (High) pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!