Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) (Anthropic) and Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) (SpaceXAI) are not peers on the headline index, which makes the trade-offs the interesting part. Their widest difference is the intelligence index, with Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max ahead by 19.0 points (54.5 versus 35.5). No hands-on testing went into this write-up; it summarises the recorded benchmark, price and speed data for both models.
The headline benchmark
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max records 54.5 on the intelligence index and Grok 4.7 Xhigh records 35.5. A gap this large suggests the two are built for different jobs. In relative terms, Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max scores 54% higher.
Among 109 active scored models, Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max sits 9th and Grok 4.7 Xhigh 38th.
Neither model has a separate coding or math index recorded yet, so those narrower comparisons will have to wait for more data.
Running costs
The list prices are $2.00 in and $10.00 out for Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max, and $2.00 in and $6.00 out for Grok 4.7 Xhigh, per million tokens. That makes Grok 4.7 Xhigh's output 40% cheaper.
For a sample workload of 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens, Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max would cost $4.00 and Grok 4.7 Xhigh $3.20, a difference of $0.80. Scale it up to summarising 1,000 documents of 8,000 tokens into 400-token summaries and the bill is $20.00 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max against $18.40 for Grok 4.7 Xhigh. On a 3:1 blend of input to output tokens, that works out to $4.00 versus $3.00 per million.
Which is newer
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max arrived on September 28, 2026, 7 days after Grok 4.7 Xhigh (September 21, 2026). They are effectively contemporaries.
Value for money
A blunt value measure, blended price over intelligence score, puts Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max at $0.073 and Grok 4.7 Xhigh at $0.085 per point. With the higher score and the lower cost per point, Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max is the better value per point on these numbers.
Throughput and time to first token
Once a response is under way, Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max produces roughly 136 tokens per second against 65 tokens per second for Grok 4.7 Xhigh. Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max is ahead by 110% on throughput. Before any text appears, Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max takes 6.5 minutes and Grok 4.7 Xhigh 43 seconds. On total time, Grok 4.7 Xhigh wins at ordinary lengths; Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max's higher throughput only pays off beyond about 43,000 tokens. Waits that long are felt on every chat-style request, though they matter less for batch jobs.
Put together, a 1,000-token answer would take about 6.6 minutes from Claude Sonnet 5.5 Max and 59 seconds from Grok 4.7 Xhigh, counting the first-token wait.

Comments (0)
to join the discussion
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!