Head-to-head AI model comparison graphic: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (DeepSeek) vs Qwen3.8 Max (Alibaba). Intelligence index 32.6 vs 33.7; output speed 162 vs 38 tokens per second; time to first token 1.2s vs 3.2s; output price $1.20 vs $6.00 per million tokens; input price $0.30 vs $2.00 per million tokens. franklineh.com
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Max: head-to-head AI benchmark comparison. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 leads on output speed, time to first token, output price and input price; Qwen3.8 Max leads on intelligence index.
Head to headUpdated

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902 compared

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads the intelligence index 33.7 to 32.6. Compare price, speed, latency and a clear verdict.

Pick it for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 · Max

  • Lower cost: $0.54 against $3.20 for 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens.
  • Faster output: 162 tokens per second against 38 tokens per second.
  • Shorter wait for the first token: 1.2 seconds against 3.2 seconds.

Pick it for Qwen3.8 Max · 0902

  • Higher intelligence index: 33.7 against 32.6.

By the numbers

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Intelligence Index32.633.7
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.30$2.00
Output price (per 1M tokens)$1.20$6.00
Output speed (tokens/s)16238
Time to first token1.2s3.2s
Release date2026-10-172026-09-02

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) are close rivals from DeepSeek and Alibaba. No hands-on testing went into this write-up; it summarises the recorded benchmark, price and speed data for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max streams output at about 162 tokens per second, 4.2 times the rate of Qwen3.8 Max 0902.

Speed and latency

Once a response is under way, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max produces roughly 162 tokens per second against 38 tokens per second for Qwen3.8 Max 0902. That makes DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max roughly 4.2 times as fast at writing. Before any text appears, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max takes 1.2 seconds and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 3.2 seconds. In an interactive app, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max will feel noticeably more responsive.

For an 800-token response, first token plus generation comes to roughly 6.2 seconds on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max and 24 seconds on Qwen3.8 Max 0902.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads on the intelligence index

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max records 32.6 on the intelligence index and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 records 33.7. The lead is visible but narrow, so it should not decide the choice on its own. In relative terms, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 scores 3% higher.

Across the 109 active models with an intelligence score in the catalogue, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max ranks 45th and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 ranks 44th.

Neither model has a separate coding or math index recorded yet, so those narrower comparisons will have to wait for more data.

Which is newer

The release dates are September 2, 2026 for Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and October 17, 2026 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max, about a month apart. That is close enough to count them as the same generation.

Cost: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max is cheaper

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max lists $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 lists $2.00 and $6.00. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 costs 5 times as much per output token.

A reference job of 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens costs $0.54 with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max and $3.20 with Qwen3.8 Max 0902, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max saves $2.66. Scale it up to extracting fields from 20,000 pages of 1,500 tokens into 150-token records and the bill is $12.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max against $78.00 for Qwen3.8 Max 0902.

Value for money

A blunt value measure, blended price over intelligence score, puts DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max at $0.016 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 at $0.089 per point. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 costs 5.5 times as much per point, which is the price of its lead.

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max better than Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

It depends on what you need: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 scores higher on the intelligence index, 33.7 to 32.6; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max is 83% cheaper on blended price; and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max streams output 4.2 times as fast.

Who makes DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max and Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max was released on October 17, 2026 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 on September 2, 2026.

Is Qwen3.8 Max 0902 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max is cheaper on a blended basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max lists $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 lists $2.00 and $6.00. For 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens that is $0.54 against $3.20.

Which is newer, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max is newer. It was released on October 17, 2026, about a month after Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (September 2, 2026).

Was this comparison tested by hand?

The figures are the recorded benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's model catalogue. This page is written from that data automatically; neither model was tested by hand for it.

Final whistle

Bottom line: on balance the numbers favour DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max, though Qwen3.8 Max 0902 keeps a case of its own. Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Max if cost matters ($1.20 against $6.00 per million output tokens) and long outputs need to finish quickly. Pick Qwen3.8 Max 0902 if you need the higher overall score (33.7 against 32.6).

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!