DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash compared

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the intelligence index 26.7 to 23.1. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 91% less on blended price. See token costs, speed and which to pick.

Metric	DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)	MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Intelligence Index	23.1	26.7
Input price (per 1M tokens)	$1.32	$0.14
Output price (per 1M tokens)	$3.96	$0.28
Output speed (tokens/s)	67	36
Time to first token	1.7s	3.5s
Release date	2026-08-13	2026-09-21

Metric

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Intelligence Index

23.1

26.7

Input price (per 1M tokens)

$1.32

$0.14

Output price (per 1M tokens)

$3.96

$0.28

Output speed (tokens/s)

Time to first token

1.7s

3.5s

Release date

2026-08-13

2026-09-21

Here is how DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max), built by DeepSeek, lines up against MiMo-V2.6-Flash from Xiaomi. Cost is where they split the most, with MiMo-V2.6-Flash working out at about 9% of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max's blended rate. No hands-on testing went into this write-up; it summarises the recorded benchmark, price and speed data for both models.

Token pricing and a sample bill

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max lists $1.32 per million input tokens and $3.96 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists $0.14 and $0.28. For output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max is 14 times the price of MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Take 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens: that comes to $2.11 on DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and $0.20 on MiMo-V2.6-Flash. A bigger example, a support assistant answering 10,000 conversations of 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each, costs $46.20 on DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and $4.20 on MiMo-V2.6-Flash: a gap of $42.00. Blended at three input tokens per output token, the effective rates are $1.98 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and $0.175 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Overall capability: 3.6 points apart

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max records 23.1 on the intelligence index and MiMo-V2.6-Flash records 26.7. A lead of this size is hard to dismiss as noise. In relative terms, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 16% higher.

For context, that places DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max 72nd and MiMo-V2.6-Flash 64th out of 109 scored models still on offer.

The catalogue does not yet split either model's score into coding and math indexes.

Score per dollar

A blunt value measure, blended price over intelligence score, puts DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max at $0.086 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash at $0.0066 per point. With the higher score and the lower cost per point, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the better value per point on these numbers.

Which is newer

The release dates are August 13, 2026 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and September 21, 2026 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash, 39 days apart. That is close enough to count them as the same generation.

Speed and latency

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max generates about 67 tokens per second and MiMo-V2.6-Flash about 36 tokens per second. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max is ahead by 87% on throughput. Time to first token is 1.7 seconds for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and 3.5 seconds for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max gets to its first token twice as fast.

For a 1,000-token response, first token plus generation comes to roughly 17 seconds on DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and 31 seconds on MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

It depends on what you need: MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on the intelligence index, 26.7 to 23.1; MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 91% cheaper on blended price; and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max streams output 1.9 times as fast.

Which is newer, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is newer. It was released on September 21, 2026, 39 days after DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max (August 13, 2026).

Are DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash from the same company?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max is made by DeepSeek and MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max was released on August 13, 2026 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash on September 21, 2026.

Where do these numbers come from?

The figures are the recorded benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's model catalogue. This page is written from that data automatically; neither model was tested by hand for it.

Which is faster, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max generates output faster, at 67 tokens per second against 36 tokens per second. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max reaches its first token sooner (1.7 seconds against 3.5 seconds).

Final whistle

Bottom line: MiMo-V2.6-Flash has more going for it here, but DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max is not without an argument. Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash if cost matters ($0.28 against $3.96 per million output tokens) and you need the higher overall score (26.7 against 23.1). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max if long outputs need to finish quickly and users are waiting on the first word.

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.