Head-to-head AI model comparison graphic: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Alibaba). Intelligence index 23.1 vs 20.1; output speed 67 vs 38 tokens per second; time to first token 1.7s vs 4.1s; output price $3.96 vs $3.00 per million tokens; input price $1.32 vs $0.50 per million tokens. franklineh.com
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.8 27B: head-to-head AI benchmark comparison. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads on intelligence index, output speed and time to first token; Qwen3.8 27B leads on output price and input price.
Head to headUpdated

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max vs Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh compared

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max leads the intelligence index 23.1 to 20.1. Benchmarks, sample bills, speed and a verdict.

Pick it for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 · Max

  • Higher intelligence index: 23.1 against 20.1.
  • Faster output: 67 tokens per second against 38 tokens per second.
  • Shorter wait for the first token: 1.7 seconds against 4.1 seconds.

Pick it for Qwen3.8 27B · Xhigh

  • Lower cost: $1.10 against $2.11 for 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens.

By the numbers

MetricDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Intelligence Index23.120.1
Input price (per 1M tokens)$1.32$0.50
Output price (per 1M tokens)$3.96$3.00
Output speed (tokens/s)6738
Time to first token1.7s4.1s
Release date2026-08-132026-08-14

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) from DeepSeek and Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) from Alibaba are both tracked in Franklin AI's benchmark catalogue. Once text starts flowing, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max is the quicker writer by a wide margin, at 1.7 times the output speed of Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh. This page is written automatically from catalogue numbers only: benchmark scores, list prices and measured speed.

How fast they respond

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max generates about 67 tokens per second and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh about 38 tokens per second. That makes DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max roughly 1.7 times as fast at writing. Time to first token is 1.7 seconds for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and 4.1 seconds for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max gets to its first token 2.4 times as fast.

Put together, a 2,000-token answer would take about 32 seconds from DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and 56 seconds from Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh, counting the first-token wait.

Reasoning and overall scores

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max comes out ahead on the intelligence index, 23.1 to 20.1. That is a clear margin for an index that averages many evaluations. Put another way, Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh would need 15% more on this index to draw level.

Among 109 active scored models, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max sits 72nd and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh 78th.

Specialist coding and math indexes are missing for both, so treat the overall score as the only capability signal here.

Generation gap

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max came first, on August 13, 2026; Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh followed on August 14, 2026. They are effectively contemporaries.

Price per token

Per million tokens, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max charges $1.32 for input and $3.96 for output, while Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh charges $0.50 and $3.00. For output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max is 1.3 times the price of Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh.

For a sample workload of 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max would cost $2.11 and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh $1.10, a difference of $1.01. A bigger example, a month of coding-assistant traffic at 30 million input and 3 million output tokens, costs $51.48 on DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and $24.00 on Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh: a gap of $27.48. On a 3:1 blend of input to output tokens, that works out to $1.98 versus $1.125 per million.

Cost per point of intelligence

Dividing the blended price by the intelligence index gives a rough cost per point: $0.086 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and $0.056 for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh, per million tokens. So DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max buys its higher score at a premium, while Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh is the value pick, paying 35% less per point.

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max better than Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh?

Not across the board: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max scores higher on the intelligence index, 23.1 to 20.1; Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh is 43% cheaper on blended price; and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max streams output 1.7 times as fast.

Who makes DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max is made by DeepSeek and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max was released on August 13, 2026 and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh on August 14, 2026.

When were DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh released?

Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh is newer. It was released on August 14, 2026, one day after DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max (August 13, 2026).

Is Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max?

Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh is cheaper on a blended basis. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max lists $1.32 per million input tokens and $3.96 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh lists $0.50 and $3.00. For 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens that is $2.11 against $1.10.

Where do these numbers come from?

The figures are the recorded benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's model catalogue. This page is written from that data automatically; neither model was tested by hand for it.

Final whistle

Short answer: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max has more going for it here, but Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh is not without an argument. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Max if you need the higher overall score (23.1 against 20.1) and long outputs need to finish quickly. Pick Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh if cost matters ($3.00 against $3.96 per million output tokens).

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) and Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!