Head-to-head AI model comparison graphic: GLM-5.3-Flash (Z AI) vs Mistral Large 4 (Mistral). Intelligence index 27.8 vs 26.1; output speed 56 vs 139 tokens per second; time to first token 1.6s vs 1.7s; output price $0.50 vs $2.10 per million tokens; input price $0.15 vs $0.70 per million tokens. franklineh.com
GLM-5.3-Flash vs Mistral Large 4: head-to-head AI benchmark comparison. GLM-5.3-Flash leads on intelligence index, time to first token, output price and input price; Mistral Large 4 leads on output speed.
Head to headUpdated

GLM-5.3-Flash vs Mistral Large 4 High compared

GLM-5.3-Flash leads the intelligence index 27.8 to 26.1. GLM-5.3-Flash costs 77% less on blended price. Benchmarks, sample bills, speed and a verdict.

Pick it for GLM-5.3-Flash

  • Lower cost: $0.25 against $1.12 for 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens.
  • Higher intelligence index: 27.8 against 26.1.

Pick it for Mistral Large 4 · High

  • Faster output once writing: 139 tokens per second against 56 tokens per second, which wins on total time beyond about 50 tokens.
  • The newer release (October 2026).

By the numbers

MetricGLM-5.3-FlashMistral Large 4 (High)
Intelligence Index27.826.1
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.70
Output price (per 1M tokens)$0.50$2.10
Output speed (tokens/s)56139
Time to first token1.6s1.7s
Release date2026-08-262026-10-29

GLM-5.3-Flash and Mistral Large 4 (High) are close rivals from Z AI and Mistral. The clearest gap is on the bill: Mistral Large 4 High is 4.4 times the blended price of GLM-5.3-Flash. Everything below is read from the benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's catalogue; nothing here comes from a hands-on test.

Running costs

Per million tokens, GLM-5.3-Flash charges $0.15 for input and $0.50 for output, while Mistral Large 4 High charges $0.70 and $2.10. For output tokens, Mistral Large 4 High is 4.2 times the price of GLM-5.3-Flash.

For a sample workload of 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens, GLM-5.3-Flash would cost $0.25 and Mistral Large 4 High $1.12, a difference of $0.87. A bigger example, a support assistant answering 10,000 conversations of 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each, costs $5.50 on GLM-5.3-Flash and $24.50 on Mistral Large 4 High: a gap of $19.00. Blended at three input tokens per output token, the effective rates are $0.238 for GLM-5.3-Flash and $1.05 for Mistral Large 4 High.

Reasoning and overall scores

GLM-5.3-Flash records 27.8 on the intelligence index and Mistral Large 4 High records 26.1. The lead is visible but narrow, so it should not decide the choice on its own. Put another way, Mistral Large 4 High would need 7% more on this index to draw level.

Across the 109 active models with an intelligence score in the catalogue, GLM-5.3-Flash ranks 63rd and Mistral Large 4 High ranks 65th.

There are no coding or math index scores for either model in the catalogue, which keeps this comparison at the aggregate level.

When they came out

The release dates are August 26, 2026 for GLM-5.3-Flash and October 29, 2026 for Mistral Large 4 High, about 2 months apart.

Mistral Large 4 High is the faster writer

Measured output speed is 56 tokens per second for GLM-5.3-Flash and 139 tokens per second for Mistral Large 4 High. That makes Mistral Large 4 High roughly 2.5 times as fast at writing. The wait for the first token averages 1.6 seconds on GLM-5.3-Flash against 1.7 seconds on Mistral Large 4 High.

Put together, a 1,000-token answer would take about 20 seconds from GLM-5.3-Flash and 8.9 seconds from Mistral Large 4 High, counting the first-token wait. Counting that wait, Mistral Large 4 High only pulls ahead on outputs beyond about 50 tokens.

Score per dollar

A blunt value measure, blended price over intelligence score, puts GLM-5.3-Flash at $0.0085 and Mistral Large 4 High at $0.040 per point. With the higher score and the lower cost per point, GLM-5.3-Flash is the better value per point on these numbers.

FAQ

Is GLM-5.3-Flash better than Mistral Large 4 High?

Neither wins everywhere: GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on the intelligence index, 27.8 to 26.1; GLM-5.3-Flash is 77% cheaper on blended price; and Mistral Large 4 High streams output 2.5 times as fast.

Which is newer, GLM-5.3-Flash or Mistral Large 4 High?

Mistral Large 4 High is newer. It was released on October 29, 2026, about 2 months after GLM-5.3-Flash (August 26, 2026).

How much do GLM-5.3-Flash and Mistral Large 4 High cost?

GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper on a blended basis. GLM-5.3-Flash lists $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 High lists $0.70 and $2.10. For 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens that is $0.25 against $1.12.

Where do these numbers come from?

The figures are the recorded benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's model catalogue. This page is written from that data automatically; neither model was tested by hand for it.

Which is faster, GLM-5.3-Flash or Mistral Large 4 High?

Mistral Large 4 High generates output faster, at 139 tokens per second against 56 tokens per second. Time to first token is similar: 1.6 seconds and 1.7 seconds. Counting the first-token wait, GLM-5.3-Flash finishes short replies first and Mistral Large 4 High pulls ahead beyond about 50 tokens.

Final whistle

Short answer: GLM-5.3-Flash is the stronger all-round pick on this data, while Mistral Large 4 High makes sense in narrower cases. Pick GLM-5.3-Flash if cost matters ($0.50 against $2.10 per million output tokens) and you need the higher overall score (27.8 against 26.1). Pick Mistral Large 4 High if your outputs often run past about 50 tokens and you want the more recent release.

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the GLM-5.3-Flash and Mistral Large 4 (High) pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!