Head-to-head AI model comparison graphic: GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) vs Mistral Large 4 (Mistral). Intelligence index 23.8 vs 26.1; output speed 125 vs 139 tokens per second; time to first token 108s vs 1.7s; output price $1.20 vs $2.10 per million tokens; input price $0.20 vs $0.70 per million tokens. franklineh.com
GPT-5.6 Luna vs Mistral Large 4: head-to-head AI benchmark comparison. Mistral Large 4 leads on intelligence index, output speed and time to first token; GPT-5.6 Luna leads on output price and input price.
Head to headUpdated

GPT-5.6 Luna Max vs Mistral Large 4 High compared

Mistral Large 4 High leads the intelligence index 26.1 to 23.8. GPT-5.6 Luna Max costs 57% less on blended price. See token costs, speed and which to pick.

Pick it for GPT-5.6 Luna · Max

  • Lower cost: $0.44 against $1.12 for 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens.

Pick it for Mistral Large 4 · High

  • Shorter wait for the first token: 1.7 seconds against 108 seconds.
  • Higher intelligence index: 26.1 against 23.8.
  • Faster output: 139 tokens per second against 125 tokens per second.

By the numbers

MetricGPT-5.6 Luna (Max)Mistral Large 4 (High)
Intelligence Index23.826.1
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.70
Output price (per 1M tokens)$1.20$2.10
Output speed (tokens/s)125139
Time to first token108s1.7s
Release date2026-07-092026-10-29

On the headline score, OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) and Mistral's Mistral Large 4 (High) are almost level. All numbers are the catalogue's recorded values; nobody ran either model by hand for this page. Time to first token is the standout number here: 1.7 seconds for Mistral Large 4 High, 108 seconds for GPT-5.6 Luna Max.

Mistral Large 4 High is the faster writer

Once a response is under way, GPT-5.6 Luna Max produces roughly 125 tokens per second against 139 tokens per second for Mistral Large 4 High. That makes Mistral Large 4 High roughly 1.1 times as fast at writing. The wait for the first token averages 108 seconds on GPT-5.6 Luna Max against 1.7 seconds on Mistral Large 4 High. GPT-5.6 Luna Max waits 62 times as long before its first token. Waits that long are felt on every chat-style request, though they matter less for batch jobs.

Add the two numbers up for a 2,000-token reply and Mistral Large 4 High finishes first: 2.1 minutes for GPT-5.6 Luna Max, 16 seconds for Mistral Large 4 High.

Mistral Large 4 High leads on the intelligence index

The catalogue puts GPT-5.6 Luna Max at 23.8 and Mistral Large 4 High at 26.1 on its intelligence index. That is a modest edge: real, but small enough that the right set of tasks could reverse it. Put another way, GPT-5.6 Luna Max would need 10% more on this index to draw level.

Across the 109 active models with an intelligence score in the catalogue, GPT-5.6 Luna Max ranks 70th and Mistral Large 4 High ranks 65th.

Specialist coding and math indexes are missing for both, so treat the overall score as the only capability signal here.

When they came out

Mistral Large 4 High arrived on October 29, 2026, about 4 months after GPT-5.6 Luna Max (July 9, 2026).

Running costs

GPT-5.6 Luna Max lists $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 High lists $0.70 and $2.10. For output tokens, Mistral Large 4 High is 1.8 times the price of GPT-5.6 Luna Max.

For a sample workload of 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna Max would cost $0.44 and Mistral Large 4 High $1.12, a difference of $0.68. For a month of coding-assistant traffic at 30 million input and 3 million output tokens, GPT-5.6 Luna Max would come in 65% lower: $9.60 for GPT-5.6 Luna Max against $27.30 for Mistral Large 4 High.

Cost per point of intelligence

Per point of intelligence index, GPT-5.6 Luna Max costs $0.019 of blended price per million tokens and Mistral Large 4 High $0.040. GPT-5.6 Luna Max delivers each index point for 53% less; whether Mistral Large 4 High's extra 2.3 points are worth the premium depends on how often your tasks need them.

Quick answers

Is Mistral Large 4 High better than GPT-5.6 Luna Max?

Neither wins everywhere: Mistral Large 4 High scores higher on the intelligence index, 26.1 to 23.8; GPT-5.6 Luna Max is 57% cheaper on blended price; and Mistral Large 4 High streams output 1.1 times as fast.

Which model has lower latency?

Mistral Large 4 High generates output faster, at 139 tokens per second against 125 tokens per second. Mistral Large 4 High reaches its first token sooner (1.7 seconds against 108 seconds).

Who makes GPT-5.6 Luna Max and Mistral Large 4 High?

GPT-5.6 Luna Max is made by OpenAI and Mistral Large 4 High by Mistral. GPT-5.6 Luna Max was released on July 9, 2026 and Mistral Large 4 High on October 29, 2026.

Where do these numbers come from?

The figures are the recorded benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's model catalogue. This page is written from that data automatically; neither model was tested by hand for it.

When were GPT-5.6 Luna Max and Mistral Large 4 High released?

Mistral Large 4 High is newer. It was released on October 29, 2026, about 4 months after GPT-5.6 Luna Max (July 9, 2026).

Final whistle

Mistral Large 4 High is the stronger all-round pick on this data, while GPT-5.6 Luna Max makes sense in narrower cases. Pick GPT-5.6 Luna Max if cost matters ($1.20 against $2.10 per million output tokens). Pick Mistral Large 4 High if users are waiting on the first word and you need the higher overall score (26.1 against 23.8).

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) and Mistral Large 4 (High) pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!