Head-to-head AI model comparison graphic: GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash (Xiaomi). Intelligence index 27.9 vs 26.7; output speed 121 vs 36 tokens per second; time to first token 2.0 min vs 3.5s; output price $0.50 vs $0.28 per million tokens; input price $0.10 vs $0.14 per million tokens. franklineh.com
GPT-6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: head-to-head AI benchmark comparison. GPT-6 Luna leads on intelligence index, output speed and input price; MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads on time to first token and output price.
Head to headUpdated

GPT-6 Luna Max vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which is faster?

GPT-6 Luna Max leads the intelligence index 27.9 to 26.7. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 13% less on blended price. Compare price, speed, latency and a clear verdict.

Pick it for GPT-6 Luna · Max

  • Faster output once writing: 121 tokens per second against 36 tokens per second, which wins on total time beyond about 6,000 tokens.
  • Higher intelligence index: 27.9 against 26.7.

Pick it for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • Shorter wait for the first token: 3.5 seconds against 2.0 minutes.
  • Lower cost: $0.20 against $0.20 for 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens.

By the numbers

MetricGPT-6 Luna (Max)MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Intelligence Index27.926.7
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.14
Output price (per 1M tokens)$0.50$0.28
Output speed (tokens/s)12136
Time to first token2.0 min3.5s
Release date2026-09-222026-09-21

GPT-6 Luna (Max) from OpenAI and MiMo-V2.6-Flash from Xiaomi land within 1.2 points of each other on the intelligence index. The biggest gap is output speed, where GPT-6 Luna Max records 121 tokens per second and MiMo-V2.6-Flash 36 tokens per second. Everything below is read from the benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's catalogue; nothing here comes from a hands-on test.

Throughput and time to first token

Once a response is under way, GPT-6 Luna Max produces roughly 121 tokens per second against 36 tokens per second for MiMo-V2.6-Flash. GPT-6 Luna Max is ahead by 237% on throughput. The wait for the first token averages 2.0 minutes on GPT-6 Luna Max against 3.5 seconds on MiMo-V2.6-Flash. That is a genuine trade-off: MiMo-V2.6-Flash starts sooner, while GPT-6 Luna Max finishes first once outputs run beyond about 6,000 tokens. A first-token wait of that length suits background work better than live conversation.

For a 2,000-token response, first token plus generation comes to roughly 2.3 minutes on GPT-6 Luna Max and 59 seconds on MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

How the intelligence index compares

GPT-6 Luna Max records 27.9 on the intelligence index and MiMo-V2.6-Flash records 26.7. The lead is visible but narrow, so it should not decide the choice on its own.

Across the 109 active models with an intelligence score in the catalogue, GPT-6 Luna Max ranks 62nd and MiMo-V2.6-Flash ranks 64th.

There are no coding or math index scores for either model in the catalogue, which keeps this comparison at the aggregate level.

Pricing depends on your mix

GPT-6 Luna Max lists $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists $0.14 and $0.28. Neither is cheaper across the board: GPT-6 Luna Max has the lower input rate and MiMo-V2.6-Flash the lower output rate, so the shape of your traffic decides it.

A sample workload of 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens costs about the same on either: $0.20 against $0.20. Scale it up to classifying 100,000 short messages at 150 input tokens and 5 output tokens each and the bill is $1.75 for GPT-6 Luna Max against $2.24 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Release timing

MiMo-V2.6-Flash came first, on September 21, 2026; GPT-6 Luna Max followed on September 22, 2026. They are effectively contemporaries.

Value for money

Dividing the blended price by the intelligence index gives a rough cost per point: $0.0072 for GPT-6 Luna Max and $0.0066 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash, per million tokens. So neither is a bargain relative to the other; you pay for what the index measures.

Quick answers

Is GPT-6 Luna Max better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Neither wins everywhere: GPT-6 Luna Max scores higher on the intelligence index, 27.9 to 26.7; MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 13% cheaper on blended price; GPT-6 Luna Max streams output 3.4 times as fast; and MiMo-V2.6-Flash reaches its first token sooner.

Which model has lower latency?

GPT-6 Luna Max generates output faster, at 121 tokens per second against 36 tokens per second. MiMo-V2.6-Flash reaches its first token sooner (3.5 seconds against 2.0 minutes). Counting the first-token wait, MiMo-V2.6-Flash finishes short replies first and GPT-6 Luna Max pulls ahead beyond about 6,000 tokens.

Which is newer, GPT-6 Luna Max or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

GPT-6 Luna Max is newer. It was released on September 22, 2026, one day after MiMo-V2.6-Flash (September 21, 2026).

How much do GPT-6 Luna Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash cost?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper on a blended basis. GPT-6 Luna Max lists $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists $0.14 and $0.28. For 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens that is $0.20 against $0.20.

Where do these numbers come from?

The figures are the recorded benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's model catalogue. This page is written from that data automatically; neither model was tested by hand for it.

Final whistle

In one line: on balance the numbers favour MiMo-V2.6-Flash, though GPT-6 Luna Max keeps a case of its own. Pick GPT-6 Luna Max if your outputs often run past about 6,000 tokens and you need the higher overall score (27.9 against 26.7). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash if users are waiting on the first word and cost matters ($0.28 against $0.50 per million output tokens).

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the GPT-6 Luna (Max) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!