AI Model Comparison

Grok 4.7 (Low) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium)

Compare Grok 4.7 (Low) vs GPT-6 Astra (Medium) with benchmark results, speed, pricing, and practical workflow guidance.

Grok 4.7 Low has lower listed token rates than GPT-6 Astra Medium, a shorter reported first-token delay and higher output throughput. Astra has the higher intelligence index. The Low and Medium labels are part of the configuration and should accompany the result when comparing these entries.

What the captured data shows

Grok 4.7 Low has lower listed token rates than GPT-6 Astra Medium, a shorter reported first-token delay and higher output throughput. Astra has the higher intelligence index. The Low and Medium labels are part of the configuration and should accompany the result when comparing these entries.

Which model fits your workflow

For interactive work, inspect both the delay and the quality of the first usable answer. For longer jobs, record completion time and any revisions. A favorable rate or timing measurement becomes useful only when the model meets the actual requirement often enough to reduce the total effort.

Decision takeaway

The recorded operational figures favor Grok Low, while the aggregate index favors Astra Medium. Use matched task examples to evaluate the tradeoff.

These figures come from Franklin’s Artificial Analysis-sourced model records captured on 2026-10-11. Read the individual model entries for the data snapshot: Grok 4.7 (Low) and GPT-6 Astra (Medium). Missing measurements remain unavailable; this page does not report a new hands-on test.

Benchmark table

Side-by-side scores, speed, and pricing for the selected models.

Metric SpaceXAI Grok 4.7 (Low) OpenAI GPT-6 Astra (Medium)
Index Scores
Intelligence Index 42.2 49.6
Coding Index- 76.7
Math Index--
Benchmark Scores

Verdict

The recorded operational figures favor Grok Low, while the aggregate index favors Astra Medium. Use matched task examples to evaluate the tradeoff.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!