Head-to-head AI model comparison graphic: Kimi K3 (Kimi) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Alibaba). Intelligence index 17.4 vs 20.1; output speed 49 vs 38 tokens per second; time to first token 3.6s vs 4.1s; output price $15.00 vs $3.00 per million tokens; input price $3.00 vs $0.50 per million tokens. franklineh.com
Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 27B: head-to-head AI benchmark comparison. Qwen3.8 27B leads on intelligence index, output price and input price; Kimi K3 leads on output speed and time to first token.
Head to headUpdated

Kimi K3 Low vs Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh: price, speed and benchmarks

Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh leads the intelligence index 20.1 to 17.4. Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh costs 81% less on blended price. Benchmarks, sample bills, speed and a verdict.

Pick it for Kimi K3 · Low

  • Faster output: 49 tokens per second against 38 tokens per second.

Pick it for Qwen3.8 27B · Xhigh

  • Lower cost: $1.10 against $6.00 for 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens.
  • Higher intelligence index: 20.1 against 17.4.

By the numbers

MetricKimi K3 (Low)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Intelligence Index17.420.1
Input price (per 1M tokens)$3.00$0.50
Output price (per 1M tokens)$15.00$3.00
Output speed (tokens/s)4938
Time to first token3.6s4.1s
Release date2026-07-162026-08-14

Kimi K3 (Low) and Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) are close rivals from Kimi and Alibaba. Price separates them more than anything else; on a blended basis Kimi K3 Low costs 5.3 times as much as Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh. Everything below is read from the benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's catalogue; nothing here comes from a hands-on test.

What they cost

The list prices are $3.00 in and $15.00 out for Kimi K3 Low, and $0.50 in and $3.00 out for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh, per million tokens. For output tokens, Kimi K3 Low is 5 times the price of Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh.

A reference job of 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens costs $6.00 with Kimi K3 Low and $1.10 with Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh, so Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh saves $4.90. A bigger example, a month of coding-assistant traffic at 30 million input and 3 million output tokens, costs $135 on Kimi K3 Low and $24.00 on Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh: a gap of $111. Blended at three input tokens per output token, the effective rates are $6.00 for Kimi K3 Low and $1.125 for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh.

When they came out

Kimi K3 Low came first, on July 16, 2026; Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh followed on August 14, 2026. They are effectively contemporaries.

Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh leads on the intelligence index

Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh comes out ahead on the intelligence index, 20.1 to 17.4. It is a small margin for an index that averages many evaluations. In relative terms, Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh scores 16% higher.

For context, that places Kimi K3 Low 86th and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh 78th out of 109 scored models still on offer.

Neither model has a separate coding or math index recorded yet, so those narrower comparisons will have to wait for more data.

Is the price in proportion?

A blunt value measure, blended price over intelligence score, puts Kimi K3 Low at $0.34 and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh at $0.056 per point. With the higher score and the lower cost per point, Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh is the better value per point on these numbers.

Speed and latency

Measured output speed is 49 tokens per second for Kimi K3 Low and 38 tokens per second for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh. Kimi K3 Low is ahead by 29% on throughput. Time to first token is 3.6 seconds for Kimi K3 Low and 4.1 seconds for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh.

Add the two numbers up for a 600-token reply and Kimi K3 Low finishes first: 16 seconds for Kimi K3 Low, 20 seconds for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh.

Common questions about Kimi K3 Low and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh

Is Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh better than Kimi K3 Low?

It depends on what you need: Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh scores higher on the intelligence index, 20.1 to 17.4; Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh is 81% cheaper on blended price; and Kimi K3 Low streams output 1.3 times as fast.

Does Kimi K3 Low respond faster than Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh?

Kimi K3 Low generates output faster, at 49 tokens per second against 38 tokens per second. Time to first token is similar: 3.6 seconds and 4.1 seconds.

When were Kimi K3 Low and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh released?

Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh is newer. It was released on August 14, 2026, 29 days after Kimi K3 Low (July 16, 2026).

Is Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh cheaper than Kimi K3 Low?

Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh is cheaper on a blended basis. Kimi K3 Low lists $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh lists $0.50 and $3.00. For 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens that is $6.00 against $1.10.

Who makes Kimi K3 Low and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh?

Kimi K3 Low is made by Kimi and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh by Alibaba. Kimi K3 Low was released on July 16, 2026 and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh on August 14, 2026.

Final whistle

The verdict: on balance the numbers favour Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh, though Kimi K3 Low keeps a case of its own. Pick Kimi K3 Low if long outputs need to finish quickly. Pick Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh if cost matters ($3.00 against $15.00 per million output tokens) and you need the higher overall score (20.1 against 17.4).

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the Kimi K3 (Low) and Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!