Head-to-head AI model comparison graphic: MiMo-V2.6-Pro (Xiaomi) vs Qwen3.8 Max (Alibaba). Intelligence index 29.9 vs 33.7; output speed 41 vs 38 tokens per second; time to first token 3.0s vs 3.2s; output price $0.87 vs $6.00 per million tokens; input price $0.435 vs $2.00 per million tokens. franklineh.com
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max: head-to-head AI benchmark comparison. MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads on output speed, time to first token, output price and input price; Qwen3.8 Max leads on intelligence index.
Head to headUpdated

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902: which is cheaper?

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads the intelligence index 33.7 to 29.9. MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs 82% less on blended price. See token costs, speed and which to pick.

Pick it for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • Lower cost: $0.61 against $3.20 for 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens.

Pick it for Qwen3.8 Max · 0902

  • Higher intelligence index: 33.7 against 29.9.

By the numbers

MetricMiMo-V2.6-ProQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Intelligence Index29.933.7
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.435$2.00
Output price (per 1M tokens)$0.87$6.00
Output speed (tokens/s)4138
Time to first token3.0s3.2s
Release date2026-09-212026-09-02

MiMo-V2.6-Pro from Xiaomi and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) from Alibaba are both tracked in Franklin AI's benchmark catalogue. The clearest gap is on the bill: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is 5.5 times the blended price of MiMo-V2.6-Pro. The figures come from tracked catalogue data, not from our own testing, so treat them as a starting point for a trial on your tasks.

Cost: MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper

Per million tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro charges $0.435 for input and $0.87 for output, while Qwen3.8 Max 0902 charges $2.00 and $6.00. That makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro's output 86% cheaper.

A reference job of 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens costs $0.61 with MiMo-V2.6-Pro and $3.20 with Qwen3.8 Max 0902, so MiMo-V2.6-Pro saves $2.59. For a chat app with 50,000 sessions of 800 input and 300 output tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro would come in 82% lower: $30.45 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro against $170 for Qwen3.8 Max 0902. On a 3:1 blend of input to output tokens, that works out to $0.544 versus $3.00 per million.

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 leads on the intelligence index

Qwen3.8 Max 0902 comes out ahead on the intelligence index, 33.7 to 29.9. A lead of this size is hard to dismiss as noise. In relative terms, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 scores 13% higher.

Across the 109 active models with an intelligence score in the catalogue, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ranks 55th and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 ranks 44th.

For coding or maths work specifically, the catalogue has no dedicated index on either side yet.

Speed and latency

Once a response is under way, MiMo-V2.6-Pro produces roughly 41 tokens per second against 38 tokens per second for Qwen3.8 Max 0902. Throughput is close to level. The wait for the first token averages 3.0 seconds on MiMo-V2.6-Pro against 3.2 seconds on Qwen3.8 Max 0902.

Add the two numbers up for a 1,000-token reply and MiMo-V2.6-Pro finishes first: 27 seconds for MiMo-V2.6-Pro, 29 seconds for Qwen3.8 Max 0902.

Release timing

The release dates are September 2, 2026 for Qwen3.8 Max 0902 and September 21, 2026 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro, 19 days apart. That is close enough to count them as the same generation.

Is the price in proportion?

Dividing the blended price by the intelligence index gives a rough cost per point: $0.018 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and $0.089 for Qwen3.8 Max 0902, per million tokens. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 costs 4.9 times as much per point, which is the price of its lead.

Quick answers

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

It depends on what you need: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 scores higher on the intelligence index, 33.7 to 29.9; and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 82% cheaper on blended price.

Are MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 from the same company?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 by Alibaba. MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on September 21, 2026 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 on September 2, 2026.

Where do these numbers come from?

The figures are the recorded benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's model catalogue. This page is written from that data automatically; neither model was tested by hand for it.

Is Qwen3.8 Max 0902 cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper on a blended basis. MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists $0.435 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 lists $2.00 and $6.00. For 1 million input and 200,000 output tokens that is $0.61 against $3.20.

Which is newer, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.8 Max 0902?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is newer. It was released on September 21, 2026, 19 days after Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (September 2, 2026).

Final whistle

Short answer: on balance the numbers favour MiMo-V2.6-Pro, though Qwen3.8 Max 0902 keeps a case of its own. Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro if cost matters ($0.87 against $6.00 per million output tokens). Pick Qwen3.8 Max 0902 if you need the higher overall score (33.7 against 29.9).

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!