Head-to-head AI model comparison graphic: Mistral Large 4 Preview (Mistral) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Alibaba). Intelligence index 25.3 vs 20.1; output speed 130 vs 38 tokens per second; time to first token 1.9s vs 4.1s; output price $2.10 vs $3.00 per million tokens; input price $0.70 vs $0.50 per million tokens. franklineh.com
Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Qwen3.8 27B: head-to-head AI benchmark comparison. Mistral Large 4 Preview leads on intelligence index, output speed, time to first token and output price; Qwen3.8 27B leads on input price.
Head to headUpdated

Mistral Large 4 Preview vs Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh compared

Mistral Large 4 Preview leads the intelligence index 25.3 to 20.1. Compare price, speed, latency and a clear verdict.

Pick it for Mistral Large 4 Preview

  • Faster output: 130 tokens per second against 38 tokens per second.
  • Higher intelligence index: 25.3 against 20.1.
  • Shorter wait for the first token: 1.9 seconds against 4.1 seconds.

Pick it for Qwen3.8 27B · Xhigh

  • Teams already building on Alibaba, if Mistral Large 4 Preview's recorded advantages are small for your workload.

By the numbers

MetricMistral Large 4 PreviewQwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Intelligence Index25.320.1
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.70$0.50
Output price (per 1M tokens)$2.10$3.00
Output speed (tokens/s)13038
Time to first token1.9s4.1s
Release date2026-10-062026-08-14

This comparison puts Mistral's Mistral Large 4 Preview next to Alibaba's Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh). Mistral Large 4 Preview streams output at about 130 tokens per second, 3.4 times the rate of Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh. What follows is built entirely from tracked data, so where the catalogue is silent, this page says so instead of guessing.

Throughput and time to first token

Measured output speed is 130 tokens per second for Mistral Large 4 Preview and 38 tokens per second for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh. On long outputs, that is a real advantage for Mistral Large 4 Preview. Time to first token is 1.9 seconds for Mistral Large 4 Preview and 4.1 seconds for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh. Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh waits 2.1 times as long before its first token.

Put together, a 1,000-token answer would take about 9.6 seconds from Mistral Large 4 Preview and 30 seconds from Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh, counting the first-token wait.

When they came out

Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh came first, on August 14, 2026; Mistral Large 4 Preview followed on October 6, 2026.

Pricing depends on your mix

The list prices are $0.70 in and $2.10 out for Mistral Large 4 Preview, and $0.50 in and $3.00 out for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh, per million tokens. The rates cross over. Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh is cheaper to feed and Mistral Large 4 Preview is cheaper to hear back from.

A sample workload of 1 million input tokens and 200,000 output tokens costs about the same on either: $1.12 against $1.10. For classifying 100,000 short messages at 150 input tokens and 5 output tokens each, Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh would come in 22% lower: $11.55 for Mistral Large 4 Preview against $9.00 for Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh.

Reasoning and overall scores

Mistral Large 4 Preview records 25.3 on the intelligence index and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh records 20.1. That is a clear margin for an index that averages many evaluations.

Across the 109 active models with an intelligence score in the catalogue, Mistral Large 4 Preview ranks 67th and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh ranks 78th.

There are no coding or math index scores for either model in the catalogue, which keeps this comparison at the aggregate level.

Score per dollar

A blunt value measure, blended price over intelligence score, puts Mistral Large 4 Preview at $0.042 and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh at $0.056 per point. Mistral Large 4 Preview scores higher and costs less per point, so on price per point there is nothing to trade off.

FAQ

Is Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh better than Mistral Large 4 Preview?

Mistral Large 4 Preview comes out ahead on every measure the data separates: Mistral Large 4 Preview scores higher on the intelligence index, 25.3 to 20.1; Mistral Large 4 Preview is 7% cheaper on blended price; and Mistral Large 4 Preview streams output 3.4 times as fast.

Was this comparison tested by hand?

The figures are the recorded benchmark, price and speed data in Franklin AI's model catalogue. This page is written from that data automatically; neither model was tested by hand for it.

Which model has lower latency?

Mistral Large 4 Preview generates output faster, at 130 tokens per second against 38 tokens per second. Mistral Large 4 Preview reaches its first token sooner (1.9 seconds against 4.1 seconds).

When were Mistral Large 4 Preview and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh released?

Mistral Large 4 Preview is newer. It was released on October 6, 2026, about 2 months after Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh (August 14, 2026).

Are Mistral Large 4 Preview and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh from the same company?

Mistral Large 4 Preview is made by Mistral and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh by Alibaba. Mistral Large 4 Preview was released on October 6, 2026 and Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh on August 14, 2026.

Final whistle

The verdict: Mistral Large 4 Preview wins every category the data separates; Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh would need an advantage that is not in the catalogue. Pick Qwen3.8 27B Xhigh only if your own tests show an advantage the recorded data does not. Pick Mistral Large 4 Preview if long outputs need to finish quickly and you need the higher overall score (25.3 against 20.1).

Where the numbers come from

The scores, speed and prices in this comparison come from independent third-party model evaluations that Franklin AI syncs each day, and the article was written from a snapshot of them. For the latest results, open the Mistral Large 4 Preview and Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) pages. The AI Benchmark methodology explains how that data is collected and shown.

Comments (0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!