Here's a concise rewrite of the provided article: ## Lords Again Challenge Government on AI and Copyright The House of Lords has once again **rejected the government's stance** on copyright…
Here's a concise rewrite of the provided article: ## Lords Again Challenge Government on AI and Copyright The House of Lords has once again **rejected the government's stance** on copyright protection for creatives in the face of Artificial Intelligence (AI). This marks the second time the Lords have pushed back on this issue.
> The core of the dispute revolves around the Data (Use and Access) Bill and its handling of copyright protection for artists. ### Key Points of Contention * The Lords initially approved an amendment that aimed to provide **greater copyright safeguards** for creative industries against AI data scraping.
* MPs subsequently **overruled** this amendment, sending the Bill back to the Lords. * Technology Minister Baroness Jones argued that the amendment would result in "piecemeal" legislation, preempting consultations on AI and copyright. ### Accusations and Criticism The Lords' renewed push for protection has been fueled by strong criticism: * Baroness Kidron, a film director, accused ministers of being influenced by "whisperings of Silicon Valley." * Sir Elton John publicly condemned the government, accusing them of potentially "committing theft".