AI News

OpenAI condemns Robinhood's 'OpenAI tokens' | TechCrunch

OpenAI has publicly disavowed Robinhood's sale of "OpenAI tokens," clarifying that these tokens do not represent actual equity or stock in the company. In a statement released on X, OpenAI…

OpenAI condemns Robinhood's 'OpenAI tokens' | TechCrunch

Jul 6, 2025

OpenAI condemns Robinhood's 'OpenAI tokens' | TechCrunch

OpenAI has publicly disavowed Robinhood's sale of "OpenAI tokens," clarifying that these tokens do not represent actual equity or stock in the company. In a statement released on X, OpenAI…

OpenAI has publicly disavowed Robinhood's sale of "OpenAI tokens," clarifying that these tokens do not represent actual equity or stock in the company. In a statement released on X, OpenAI emphasized that it did not partner with Robinhood, was not involved in the token sale, and does not endorse it.

The company further stated that any transfer of OpenAI equity requires its approval, which was not granted in this instance. This announcement came in response to Robinhood's launch of tokenized shares of private companies, including OpenAI, aimed at providing retail investors with exposure to these assets.

Robinhood's initiative involves offering tokenized contracts that track the price of shares in private companies like OpenAI and SpaceX. However, these tokens do not grant direct ownership of the shares. Instead, Robinhood appears to be using a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) to indirectly offer exposure to OpenAI shares.

A Robinhood spokesperson explained that the tokens are part of a "limited" giveaway offering retail investors indirect exposure "through Robinhood's ownership stake in a special purpose vehicle (SPV)." The company's CEO, Vlad Tenev, acknowledged that the tokens offer retail investors exposure to these private assets.

The situation highlights the complexities of tokenized shares and their relationship to actual equity in private companies. While Robinhood argues that the tokens provide indirect exposure to the underlying assets, OpenAI's response underscores the importance of distinguishing between tokenized contracts and direct ownership.

The value of shares in an SPV can differ from actual share prices, and OpenAI's stance reflects a desire to control how its equity is valued and to prevent any misrepresentation of ownership. This incident is indicative of the broader trend of private companies closely monitoring activities that could influence the valuation of their equity.

OpenAI's reaction mirrors the concerns of other startups, such as Figure AI, which have taken legal action against brokers involved in secondary markets for their stock. The key takeaway is that OpenAI wants to make it clear that they did not authorize the sale of their shares, and that the tokens do not give the buyer actual ownership of OpenAI.