A judge rebuked Mike Lindell's lawyers for submitting a court document riddled with errors and generated using artificial intelligence in a defamation lawsuit filed by a former Dominion Vot…
A judge rebuked Mike Lindell's lawyers for submitting a court document riddled with errors and generated using artificial intelligence in a defamation lawsuit filed by a former Dominion Voting Services employee. The document contained nearly 30 defective citations, including references to nonexistent cases.
Lindell's attorney admitted to using AI in drafting the brief, claiming it was a helpful tool when used properly. The judge has ordered Lindell's attorneys to justify why they should not be sanctioned or referred to disciplinary proceedings. In response, the attorney stated that the submitted brief was a draft submitted mistakenly and that he always verifies citations regardless of AI use.
He also expressed shock at being questioned about a document he was unfamiliar with.