Explore Franklin AI
Understand new AI research with readable explanations and links to the original papers.
The study plants misinformation in five same-model assistants and measures what participants learn, how confident they become and where they return to check answers.
A LinuxArena study compares language-model-simulated tool responses with a separate executed control setting, reporting closer safety estimates in its tests.
The benchmark distinguishes refusing an uncertain action from obtaining evidence and completing the safe version of the task.
The proposed workflow retains cited arguments, reviewer interventions and outcomes before a metadata decision can become precedent.
The method stores action identities and preference relationships above a frozen scorer, with chronological evaluation of how feedback affects future choices.
The benchmark separates visual planning from navigation execution and finds mixed effects from a shared notebook.
The study traces an apparent loss improvement to a routing summary that exposed future information, then evaluates independent causal repairs.
The experiments compare what a learned policy commits, which states teach it and whether fewer decoding steps compensate for the policy’s own cost.
A reasoning study combines partial-solution quality and diversity through a direct pass-at-k objective, rather than separate selection heuristics.
The Composer deployment reports better claim selection and lower API costs after organizing approved material in a Golden Data Model.
Start with the overview to understand the paper’s main idea, then follow its original paper link for the methods, results and limitations.
Use Submit Research to send the original paper URL and explain why it is useful. An editor reviews the suggestion before publication.
